努比亚 Z60S Pro 评测：配备 35 毫米主摄像头的旗舰杀手级智能手机照片质量令人印象深刻。 努比亚 Z60S Pro 以中档手机的价格出售，但却拥有一些旗舰功能，如 IP68 等级、三频 GNSS 和高达 1 TB 的 UFS 4.0 存储空间。请阅读我们的评测，了解这款努比亚智能手机是否值得推荐购买。 Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 09/30/2024 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 5G Android Touchscreen Smartphone
努比亚 Z60S Pro 是旗舰手机努比亚 Z60 Ultra 的小兄弟。 努比亚 Z60 Ultra.与旗舰机型相比，Pro 机型在摄像头和处理器方面有一些变化--它只配备了 高通骁龙 8 代 2SoC 和低分辨率长焦镜头。不过，Z60S Pro 支持一系列新的 AI 功能，旨在提高相机质量。
努比亚中端机型的起价为 599 欧元（12 GB 内存和 256 GB 闪存），而配备 16 GB 内存和 1 TB 闪存的顶级机型则要多花 200 欧元。
Test device courtesy of Nubia
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
Nubia Z60S Pro (Z60 Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 8 x 2 - 3.2 GHz, Cortex-X3 / A715 / A710 / A510 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 740Memory12 GB Display6.78 inch 20:9, 2800 x 1260 pixel 453 PPI, capacitive Touchscreen, AMOLED, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 223 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: acceleration sensor, gyroscope, proximity sensor, compass , OTG, MiracastNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.3, 2G (850/900/1800/1900), 3G (B1/B2/B4/B5/B6/B8/B19), 4G (B1/B2/B3/B4/B5/B7/B8/B12/B17/B18/B19/B20/B25/B26/B28/B34/B38/B39/B40/B41/B42/B66), 5G (n1/n2/n3/n5/n7/n8/n20/n25/n26/n28/n38/n40/n41/n66/n77/n78), Dual SIM, LTE, 5G, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 8.7 x 163.63 x 75.98Battery5100 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 14CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.59, OIS, 35 mm, 1/1,56 Zoll, Videos @4320p/30fps) + 50 MPix (f/2.0, marcro 2,5 cm. wide angle lens) + 8 MPix (f/2.4, 3x optical telephoto lens), Camera2 API: Level 3Secondary Camera: 16 MPix ( f/2.45, under display)Additional featuresSpeakers: Stereo, case, USB cable, info material, MyOS, 12 Months Warranty, widvine L1, GPS (L1/L2/L5), GLONASS, BeiDou (B1I/B1C/B2a/B2b), Galileo (E1/E5a), QZSS (L1/L5), HDR10, HGL, fanless, waterproofWeight220 g, Power Supply: 129 g
Price599 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
潜在的竞争对手比较
RatingVersionDateModelWeightDriveSizeResolutionPrice
84.6 %v809 / 2024Nubia Z60S ProSD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740220 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2800x1260
82.1 %v808 / 2024Xiaomi Poco F6 ProSD 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740209 g1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash6.67"3200x1440
87.6 %v7 (old)v7 (old)05 / 2024Motorola Edge 50 ProSD 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720186 g512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash6.70"2712x1220
82 %v808 / 2024Realme GT 6SD 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735199 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash6.78"2780x1264
85.5 %v7 (old)v7 (old)03 / 2024Samsung Galaxy S23 FEExynos 2200, Xclipse 920209 g128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash6.40"2340x1080
注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
外壳Z60S Pro 防水
努比亚 Z60 Pro 的颜色选择得益于 6.78 英寸 OLED 面板的薄边设计，Z60S Pro 的外观非常吸引人。Z60S Pro 的显示屏屏占比接近 90%，与三星 S24 Ultra Pro 等旗舰产品非常相似。 三星Galaxy S24 Ultra.
做工符合中高端手机的要求。磨砂边框由金属制成，与玻璃背壳一样，给人留下了高品质的印象。
不过，通过 IP68 认证的防水外壳看起来非常笨重。努比亚采用龙溪耐久玻璃作为保护玻璃。
另一个特殊功能是一个可自由分配的专用按钮，用于快速启动相机或更改声音和静音配置文件（静音滑块）。
尺寸比较
Nubia Z60S Pro Realme GT 6 Motorola Edge 50 Pro Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Samsung Galaxy S23 FE DIN A6 ❌
功能特点配备快速 USB 端口的 Z60S ProZ60S Pro 有三个不同版本，内存容量从 12 GB 到 16 GB 不等，UFS 4.0 存储容量从 256 GB 到 1 TB 不等。通过 USB 接口进行的数据传输采用快速 USB 3.2 Gen1 标准，也可进行图像传输。
与三星 980 Pro 结合使用，传输速度高达 821 MB/s。支持微软 Windows 首选的 exFAT 和 NTFS 文件系统。除蓝牙 5.3 和 NFC 外，Miracast 和 USB OTG 也是努比亚手机的功能之一。
软件：努比亚 Z60S Pro 预装Android 14Z60S Pro 预装了谷歌Android 14 和该公司自己的 My OS 14 版本。在评测期间，操作系统基于 2024 年 8 月的安全补丁。
据努比亚称，Z60S Pro 的相关安全更新将至少持续到 2027 年。制造商没有就提供的操作系统升级次数发表任何声明。
可持续性可持续发展不是努比亚的营销重点之一，因此无法了解材料提取或回收的前景。
不过，这款智能手机的包装似乎不含塑料。设备本身用铝箔包裹，而包装的其他部分则由纸板制成。
通信和全球导航卫星系统：配备 5G 的 Z60S ProZ60S Pro 配备了 Wi-Fi 6，在使用华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 参考路由器时，传输速率高达 1,900 MBit/s。我们的测试设备也在 6 GHz 频段与参考路由器进行通信。因此，Z60S Pro 甚至提供了 Wi-Fi 6E，这在这个价位的产品中并不常见。
为了连接到移动数据网络，努比亚手机支持广泛的 4G 和 5G 频率。所有与德语国家有关的频率均已覆盖。
努比亚还宣传了卫星通信功能，但似乎只在中国可用，因为我们的测试设备无法选择该功能。
NetworkingNubia Z60S Pro iperf3 receive AXE11000
970 (min: 896) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
951 (min: 646) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1902 (min: 1860) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1816 (min: 1734) MBit/s ∼100%
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro iperf3 receive AXE11000
664 (min: 628) MBit/s ∼68%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
818 (min: 430) MBit/s ∼86%
Motorola Edge 50 Pro iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1600 (min: 1384) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1081 (min: 838) MBit/s ∼60%
Realme GT 6 iperf3 receive AXE11000
816 (min: 348) MBit/s ∼84%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
837 (min: 412) MBit/s ∼88%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE iperf3 receive AXE11000
914 (min: 461) MBit/s ∼94%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 789) MBit/s ∼86%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1588 (min: 1465) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1446 (min: 1398) MBit/s ∼80%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 receive AXE11000
745 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼77%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000
716 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼75%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1355 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼71%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1402 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼77%
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1902 (1860-1939) Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 720; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1600 (1384-1648) Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1804 (1734-1840) Motorola Edge 50 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Qualcomm Adreno 720; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1080 (838-1239) Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø964 (896-980) Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Qualcomm Adreno 740; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (646-1026)
楼内定位
户外定位Z60S Pro 可以使用许多全球卫星网络（其中一些是三频网络）来确定其位置。
在一次骑行中，我们将其定位质量与 Garmin Venu 2 进行了比较。
虽然在日常生活中可以毫不犹豫地执行导航任务，但努比亚手机在详细路线上的误差还是很明显的。
Garmin Venu 2 对努比亚 Zz0S Pro
电话功能和语音质量Z60S Pro 具有双卡双待功能Z60S Pro 支持两张实体 nano SIM 卡；没有 eSIM 集成。不过，努比亚手机允许 VoLTE 和通过家庭 Wi-Fi 通话（Wi-Fi 通话）。语音质量不刺耳，声音清晰响亮。
摄像头配备特殊主摄像头的 Z60S Pro与努比亚 Z60S Pro 自拍 Z60S Pro 的 5000 万像素主摄像头有些与众不同，因为镜头配备了 35 毫米等效焦距。这使得拍摄对象的距离明显比竞争对手更近。
内置的索尼 IMX906 1/1.56 英寸传感器在日光下具有良好的锐度和逼真的色彩，给人留下深刻印象。即使在受控照明条件下，色彩还原也非常成功。
努比亚手机在黑暗环境中的表现几乎令人惊讶。在这里，它能拍摄出具有大量细节的迷人照片。
分辨率相当低的 800 万像素长焦摄像头和 5000 万像素超广角摄像头可提供稳定的照片质量，但也仅此而已。不过，这在中高档产品中也是意料之中的。
0,6x
1x
2,4x
5x
10x
30 倍（最大值）
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide angleWide angleLow light5x ZoomUltra-wide angleclick to load imagesNubia Z60S ProXiaomi 14OnePlus 12Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z60S ProXiaomi 14OnePlus 12Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z60S ProXiaomi 14OnePlus 12Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z60S ProXiaomi 14OnePlus 12Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesNubia Z60S ProXiaomi 14OnePlus 12Canon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
5.8 ∆E4 ∆E5.6 ∆E8.3 ∆E5.4 ∆E4 ∆E6.1 ∆E7.3 ∆E5.6 ∆E4.7 ∆E5.1 ∆E4 ∆E6.8 ∆E7.7 ∆E7.2 ∆E2.3 ∆E5.8 ∆E10.5 ∆E6.3 ∆E0.7 ∆E3.9 ∆E5.9 ∆E2.6 ∆E1.4 ∆EColorChecker Nubia Z60S Pro: 5.29 ∆E min: 0.69 - max: 10.48 ∆E18.1 ∆E26.1 ∆E22.8 ∆E21.1 ∆E25.8 ∆E32.9 ∆E27.9 ∆E16.8 ∆E16 ∆E15.5 ∆E27.8 ∆E32 ∆E16.6 ∆E27.2 ∆E11.5 ∆E25.2 ∆E18.9 ∆E28.3 ∆E32.2 ∆E29.5 ∆E31.1 ∆E26.2 ∆E19.3 ∆E12.2 ∆EColorChecker Nubia Z60S Pro: 23.37 ∆E min: 11.5 - max: 32.92 ∆E
Nubia Z60S ProNubia Z60S Pro
配件和保修：努比亚 Z60S Pro（含保护套和适配器努比亚 Z60S Pro 的电源装置努比亚的送货范围堪称典范。
其中包括一个 80W 快速充电器、一个保护盖和一条 USB-C 数据线。此外，还附送了屏幕保护膜。
中兴通讯提供 24 个月保修。保修。
输入设备和操作：带面部解锁功能的 Z60S Pro由于采用了 120 Hz 的面板，电容式触摸屏反应迅速，动画和菜单滚动非常流畅。一个小型线性 X 轴电动马达负责振动并提供清晰的触觉反馈。
通过前置摄像头的 2D 技术或 OLED 面板上的指纹传感器实现的人脸解锁功能确保了生物识别的安全性。
光学指纹传感器工作可靠，但解锁 X60S Pro 的速度并不快。
显示屏Z60S Pro 智能手机采用 OLED 显示屏OLED 显示屏基于 RG/BG 子像素矩阵，由一个红色、一个蓝色和一个绿色发光二极管组成。6.78 英寸 120 Hz AMOLED 显示屏凭借 2,800 x 1,260 分辨率实现了 450 ppi 以上的高图像清晰度。制造商规定 Z60S Pro 的峰值亮度为 1,200 尼特，我们在播放 HDR 内容（1,141 cd/m²）时验证了这一点。
然而，正如 APL18 测试（834 cd/m²）显示的那样，该面板在日常使用中的亮度并不高。这正是竞争对手的亮度显示器的优势所在。
此外 Poco F6 Pro在 PWM 调光模式下的频率明显更高（3840 Hz）。相比之下，努比亚 Z60S Pro 使用频率较低的 980 Hz PWM 来调节亮度。
对于 120 Hz 的面板来说，PWM 振幅略低于 20%，也可以更平缓一些。
722cd/m²724cd/m²752cd/m²718cd/m²726cd/m²753cd/m²707cd/m²712cd/m²744cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 753 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 728.7 cd/m² Minimum: 2.86 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 94 %Center on Battery: 726 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.79}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}98.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.23CCT: 6399 K
Nubia Z60S ProAMOLED, 2800x1260, 6.8"Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAMOLED, 3200x1440, 6.7"Motorola Edge 50 ProP-OLED, 2712x1220, 6.7"Realme GT 6AMOLED, 2780x1264, 6.8"Samsung Galaxy S23 FEDynamic AMOLED x2, 2340x1080, 6.4"Screen5%11%31%0%Brightness middle (cd/m²)7261025 41%1064 47%975 34%897 24%Brightness (cd/m²)7291021 40%1038 42%974 34%908 25%Brightness Distribution (%)9498 4%88 -6%98 4%97 3%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *21.2 40%1.17 41%0.8 60%2.2 -10%Greyscale dE 2000 *1.22.4 -100%2 -67%0.9 25%1.7 -42%Gamma2.23 99%2.21 100%2.238 98%2.22 99%2.08 106%CCT6399 102%6656 98%6423 101%6467 101%6617 98%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *32.471.43.1* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 120 HzAmplitude: 19.61 %Secondary Frequency: 980 HzThe display backlight flickers at 120 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 120 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8152 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）
我们使用肖像显示器公司的 X-rite 分光光度计和 Calman Ultimate 软件进行分析，结果显示 Z60S Pro 相对较大的 P3 色彩空间的平均 Delta-E 偏差非常低。除了三种色彩配置文件外，还可以在设置菜单中单独调整白平衡。
色彩精度（目标色彩空间：P3，配置文件：标准）
色彩空间（目标色彩空间：P3，配置文件：标准）
灰度（目标色彩空间：P3，配置文件：标准）
色彩饱和度（目标色彩空间：P3，配置文件：标准）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.14 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.5805 ms rise↘ 0.563 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 4 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.3 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6995 ms rise↘ 0.714 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.7 ms).
这款中端手机在户外给人留下了良好的印象。Z60S Pro 有足够的亮度储备来应对大多数光线环境。不过，玻璃表面的反光可能会比较恼人。视角稳定性非常好。
性能Z60S Pro 配备高通 SoC努比亚智能手机的动力来自快速的 骁龙8代2.虽然该芯片组不是最新的 旗舰 SoC但这款中端手机在 Geekbench CPU 基准测试中仍然表现出色。
特别是在单核心方面，Z60S Pro 比高通竞争对手的 高通竞争对手.努比亚手机在系统测试中的表现也非常出色。
Geekbench 6.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreNubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
2033 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1432 - 2104, n=17)
1926 Points -5%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1898 Points -7%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=211, last 2 years)
1736 Points -15%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1601 Points -21%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1432 Points -30%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1147 Points -44% Multi-CoreAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4255 - 5765, n=17)
5226 Points 0%Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
5203 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
5100 Points -2%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=211, last 2 years)
5076 Points -2%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
4879 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
3938 Points -24%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
3129 Points -40%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1562350 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1398472 - 1607558, n=12)
1539082 Points -1%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1536373 Points -2%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1519490 Points -3%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=152, last 2 years)
1471482 Points -6%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1124908 Points -28%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
767395 Points -51%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
20394 Points Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
19083 Points -6%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11562 - 20394, n=24)
15817 Points -22%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
15165 Points -26%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=188, last 2 years)
14761 Points -28%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14517 Points -29%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
13573 Points -33%CrossMark - Overall
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (778 - 1356, n=22)
1138 Points +13%Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2674, n=129, last 2 years)
1133 Points +12%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1041 Points +3%Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1009 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
888 Points -12%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
778 Points -23%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
759 Points -25%BaseMark OS II
OverallNubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
9237 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (7354 - 9730, n=22)
8794 Points -5%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8631 Points -7%Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 14076, n=147, last 2 years)
7566 Points -18%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7179 Points -22%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
6785 Points -27%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
6028 Points -35% SystemNubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
13837 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (10786 - 15148, n=22)
13173 Points -5%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
13142 Points -5%Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 20776, n=147, last 2 years)
11285 Points -18%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
11239 Points -19%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
11081 Points -20%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
9875 Points -29% MemoryNubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
10834 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (6601 - 10834, n=22)
9479 Points -13%Average of class Smartphone (962 - 20652, n=147, last 2 years)
8571 Points -21%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
8397 Points -22%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
7614 Points -30%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
5719 Points -47%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
5456 Points -50% GraphicsAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (22837 - 32334, n=22)
27375 Points +8%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
27062 Points +7%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
25745 Points +2%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=147, last 2 years)
25504 Points +1%Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
25342 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
17941 Points -29%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
13308 Points -47% WebNubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
1902 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
1858 Points -2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (1077 - 2044, n=22)
1777 Points -7%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
1755 Points -8%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2363, n=147, last 2 years)
1685 Points -11%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
1543 Points -19%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1534 Points -19%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=137, last 2 years)
19931 Points +59%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (11338 - 16880, n=21)
15142 Points +21%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 16384
14466 Points +15%Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
12535 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
10374 Points -17%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
8985 Points -28%AImark - Score v3.x
Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
173234 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (941 - 173234, n=18)
29790 Points -83%Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=126, last 2 years)
27406 Points -84%Realme GT 6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 16384
1163 Points -99%Motorola Edge 50 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3, Adreno 720, 12288
717 Points -100%Samsung Galaxy S23 FESamsung Exynos 2200, Xclipse 920, 8192
0 Points -100%Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Average of class Smartphone (122 - 4122, n=41, last 2 years)
600 Points +168%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (224 - 505, n=4)
384 Points +71%Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
224 Points Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Average of class Smartphone (122 - 32120, n=41, last 2 years)
2301 Points +980%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (213 - 505, n=4)
383 Points +80%Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
213 Points Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Average of class Smartphone (118 - 44381, n=41, last 2 years)
3413 Points +601%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (487 - 1092, n=4)
837 Points +72%Nubia Z60S ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, Adreno 740, 12288
487 Points
一个 Adreno 740可用于处理图形工作负载。在 3DMark 测试中，Z60S Pro 领先于 Poco F6 Pro.在 GFXBench 的屏幕数值中，可以看到 90 fps 的锁定。
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3689 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3315 Points -10%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2907 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points -54%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1451 Points -61%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3709 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
3394 Points -8%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2983 Points -20%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1702 Points -54%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
1474 Points -60%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
13984 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
12705 Points -9%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11983 Points -14%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6440 Points -54%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
5434 Points -61%3DMark / Wild Life Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
6350 Points Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
4752 Points 3DMark / Solar Bay Score
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5382 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4825 Points -10%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4686 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3589 Points -33%3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5343 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
4844 Points -9%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4813 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3631 Points -32%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1081 Points Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1055 Points -2%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
986 Points -9%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1032 Points -6%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
992 Points -10%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6345 Points Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
6212 Points -2%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6113 Points -4%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4288 Points -32%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
23436 Points +9%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
21465 Points Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18743 Points -13%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11774 Points -45%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
14501 Points +3%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14132 Points Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12776 Points -10%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8483 Points -40%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +33%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
119 fps +32%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
116 fps +29%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
489 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
486 fps -1%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
451 fps -8%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
218 fps -55%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
174 fps -64%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
119 fps +32%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
112 fps +24%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
78 fps -13%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
324 fps Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
287 fps -11%Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
270 fps -17%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
135 fps -58%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
107 fps -67%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
105 fps +17%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
89 fps -1%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
60 fps -33%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
223 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
222 fps 0%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps -19%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
101 fps -55%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
84 fps -62%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
63 fps -22%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -26%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -31%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
31 fps -62%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps 0%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
129 fps Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps -30%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
63 fps -51%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -20%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps -20%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps -39%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
27 fps -61%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps -3%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps -34%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -60%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
23 fps -67%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
90 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps -1%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
62 fps -31%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps -33%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
40 fps -56%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
185 fps +2%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
181 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
175 fps -3%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 fps -57%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
57 fps -69%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
33 fps Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps -6%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
21 fps -36%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
12 fps -64%Motorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
11 fps -67%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
171.1 Points +118%Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 387, n=153, last 2 years)
154.2 Points +96%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (62.7 - 179.2, n=23)
133.1 Points +69%Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
123.193 Points +57%Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
94.736 Points +21%Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)
78.563 Points Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
13.847 Points -82%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years)
14.3 runs/min +157%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (5.56 - 12.7, n=4)
9.72 runs/min +75%Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 122)
8.98 runs/min +62%Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
7.04 runs/min +27%Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)
5.56 runs/min Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
5.18 runs/min -7%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
156 Points +100%Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=147, last 2 years)
145.9 Points +87%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (28 - 183, n=22)
130.6 Points +67%Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
130 Points +67%Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
103 Points +32%Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
101 Points +29%Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)
78 Points Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
51202 Points +128%Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
49818 Points +122%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 121337, n=200, last 2 years)
48597 Points +116%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (19870 - 65418, n=25)
45827 Points +104%Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
39130 Points +74%Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
30234 Points +35%Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)
22453 Points Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Nubia Z60S Pro (Chrome 128)
1767.4 ms * Realme GT 6 (Chrome V125))
1221.4 ms * +31%Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=155, last 2 years)
1173 ms * +34%Motorola Edge 50 Pro (Chrome 124)
1150 ms * +35%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (602 - 1837, n=22)
1023 ms * +42%Samsung Galaxy S23 FE (Chrome 121)
840.3 ms * +52%Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro (chrome 127)
802.4 ms * +55%* ... smaller is better
Nubia Z60S ProXiaomi Poco F6 ProMotorola Edge 50 ProRealme GT 6Samsung Galaxy S23 FEAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-7%-47%-12%-48%-11%-37% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)3384.813070.33 -9%1023.6 -70%3452.12 2%1657.44 -51%3664 ?(1493 - 4384, n=50) 8%2213 ?(270 - 4370, n=193, last 2 years) -35% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)2938.522987.47 2%1025.9 -65%3211.78 9%994.67 -66%2701 ?(555 - 3484, n=50) -8%1829 ?(103.2 - 4035, n=193, last 2 years) -38% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)451.45381.58 -15%337 -25%315.76 -30%322.32 -29%381 ?(218 - 483, n=50) -16%293 ?(47.6 - 548, n=193, last 2 years) -35% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)544.38520.87 -4%390.2 -28%397.65 -27%288.23 -47%405 ?(50.7 - 989, n=50) -26%335 ?(9.4 - 964, n=193, last 2 years) -38%
排放：努比亚 Z60S Pro 显示中度节流温度在恒定负载下，表面温度有些偏高；我们测得的最高温度超过 54 °C。
不过，这在 3DMark 压力测试中只得到了部分反映。Z60S Pro 的性能往往不是特别稳定，但节流情况适中。
Max. LoadIdle
54.2 °C52.2 °C42.5 °C 52.4 °C50.8 °C45.1 °C 49.9 °C50 °C42.9 °C
Maximum: 54.2 °CAverage: 48.9 °C
43.9 °C47.2 °C46.8 °C44 °C45.3 °C45 °C42.4 °C45.3 °C46.7 °C
Maximum: 47.2 °CAverage: 45.2 °C Power Supply (max.) 30.3 °C | Room Temperature 20.9 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
28.3 °C28.3 °C30.3 °C 28.3 °C28.4 °C30.1 °C 28.6 °C28.6 °C29.4 °C
Maximum: 30.3 °CAverage: 28.9 °C
26.9 °C27 °C26.5 °C27 °C27.1 °C26.6 °C27.4 °C27 °C26.7 °C
Maximum: 27.4 °CAverage: 26.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 25.6 °C | Room Temperature 22 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 48.9 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 54.2 °C / 130 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.9 °C / 84 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityMotorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
88.6 % +33%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69.9 % +5%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
66.8 % Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.7 % -18%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
54.4 % -19% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestMotorola Edge 50 ProAdreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash
98.8 % +38%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
73.5 % +2%Nubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.8 % Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
69.5 % -3%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53.7 % -25% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityNubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
91.1 % Xiaomi Poco F6 ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash
74.4 % -18%Samsung Galaxy S23 FEXclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 % -24%Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51.3 % -44% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityNubia Z60S ProAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
98.1 % Realme GT 6Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
50.3 % -49%
Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18.6 (16.1-22.4) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.7 (14.2-20.4) Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.78 (8.73-8.83) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø15 (9.85-18.3) Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø8.59 (7.53-10.2) Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø67.4 (54.1-81) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø52.1 (39.9-72.9) Motorola Edge 50 Pro Adreno 720, SD 7 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 2.2 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø29.7 (28.6-32.3) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø49 (37.2-68.4) Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø30.9 (26.6-38.1) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.3 (11.9-15.9) Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Unlimited Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.91 (8.77-12) Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø16.8 (15.8-17.4) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 1 TB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.8 (11.7-15.7) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø13.7 (8.51-16.6) Samsung Galaxy S23 FE Xclipse 920, Exynos 2200, 128 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø9.78 (8.18-11.9) Nubia Z60S Pro Adreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.12 (8.04-8.2) Realme GT 6 Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø7.01 (4.04-8.03)
扬声器在我们的测试中，努比亚手机的立体声扬声器显示出线性的中音和一丝低音。高音也只是略有下降。此外，还可以通过 USB-C 端口或蓝牙无线连接耳机。有多种音频编解码器可供选择。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Nubia Z60S Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (90.3 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 3.1% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 7.1% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 7% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 28% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 67% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy S23 FE audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (88.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.9% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 6.9% higher than median(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 5.3% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 80% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 33% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 59% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
能量Z60S Pro 充电迅速耗电量Z60S Pro 配备 5100 毫安时电池，可通过 USB-C 接口以最高 80 W 的功率充电。
这款 6.78 英寸的智能手机闲置时功耗超过 2 W，有点耗电，但负载时功耗超过 18 W，并不算低。
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.33 / 0.17 WattIdle 0.91 / 2.2 / 2.31 Watt
Load
7.64 / 18.05 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Nubia Z60S Pro5100 mAhXiaomi Poco F6 Pro5000 mAhMotorola Edge 50 Pro4500 mAhRealme GT 65500 mAhSamsung Galaxy S23 FE4500 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 Average of class Smartphone Power Consumption24%35%19%4%14%23%Idle Minimum * (Watt)0.910.79 13%0.9 1%1.01 -11%0.69 24%1.036 ?(0.7 - 2.37, n=23) -14%0.847 ?(0.4 - 1.65, n=159, last 2 years) 7%Idle Average * (Watt)2.21.05 52%1.3 41%1.09 50%1.15 48%1.766 ?(0.8 - 7.18, n=23) 20%1.431 ?(0.6 - 4.36, n=159, last 2 years) 35%Idle Maximum * (Watt)2.311.13 51%1.6 31%1.16 50%1.26 45%1.94 ?(1.07 - 8.22, n=23) 16%1.61 ?(0.85 - 4.46, n=159, last 2 years) 30%Load Average * (Watt)7.647.88 -3%4.8 37%9.86 -29%15.93 -109%7.22 ?(2.61 - 15.3, n=23) 5%7.09 ?(2.3 - 16.5, n=139, last 2 years) 7%Load Maximum * (Watt)18.0516.48 9%6.7 63%11.64 36%16.09 11%10.4 ?(4.57 - 18.1, n=23) 42%11.2 ?(3.53 - 20.8, n=139, last 2 years) 38%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.21 (1.024-14.6) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.26 (1.051-14.6) Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.076-1.206) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.863 (0.736-1.089)
Power consumption: GFXBench (150 cd/m²)
Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø3.83 (3.53-4.18) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.6 (10.3-13.1) Nubia Z60S Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø1.116 (1.076-1.206) Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.863 (0.736-1.089)
电池寿命在我们的 WLAN 测试中，这款中端手机在现实条件下表现出了出色的电池续航能力，显示屏亮度达到 150 cd/m²。
Z60S Pro 的内置电池可提供超过 17 小时的续航时间。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 128)
17h 06min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Nubia Z60S Pro5100 mAh
17.1 h Xiaomi Poco F6 Pro5000 mAh
15.2 h Motorola Edge 50 Pro4500 mAh
16.3 h Realme GT 65500 mAh
19.3 h Samsung Galaxy S23 FE4500 mAh
13.6 h
Pros+ 优质 OLED 面板
+ 高质量外壳，达到 IP68 防护等级
+ 高速芯片组和内存
+ 吸引人的主摄像头
+ 快速充电+前置电源适配器
+ 功能强大Cons- 显示屏可以再亮一些
- 高废热 + 节流
- 仅 3 年更新
- 笨重
评语：努比亚 Z60S Pro 是一款有趣的中端手机努比亚 Z60S Pro。测试设备由努比亚提供在我们的测试中，努比亚 Z60S Pro 成为了中档手机中的佼佼者。这款来自中兴通讯子公司的智能手机价格诱人，功能齐全，包括 USB 3.2、三频 GNSS、Wi-Fi 6E，性能也很吸引人。
35 毫米广角摄像头在纸面上有些不同寻常，但其低光能力和精确校准的色彩平衡却令人惊喜。强劲的电池续航能力和动听的扬声器为努比亚 Z60S Pro 智能手机锦上添花。
凭借 Z60S Pro，努比亚为中端市场带来了一款非常有趣的智能手机，其优势明显大于劣势"。
我们只在 Z60S Pro 600 欧元以下的价格区间和较高的排放以及骁龙 8 代 2 的节流功能中看到了真正的弱点。 骁龙 8 代 2.
三年的更新保证还不错，但也没什么可写的。如果您希望获得更长时间的安全补丁，可以仔细看看 三星Galaxy S23 FE.除努比亚 Z60S Pro 之外，我们还发现了以下替代产品 摩托罗拉 Edge 50 Pro或 Poco F6 Pro.
价格和供应情况您可以从亚马逊等在线零售商或直接从制造商处购买努比亚 Z60S Pro。https://eu.nubia.com/de-de/products/nubia-z60s-pro?variant=43967257903304.
注：我们更新了评级系统，第 8 版的结果与第 7 版的结果不具可比性。 这里可在此处查阅。
Nubia Z60S Pro
- 09/27/2024 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis88%
Keyboard67 / 75 → 89%
Pointing Device92%
Connectivity62 / 69 → 89%
Weight88%
Battery91%
Display90%
Games Performance39 / 55 → 71%
Application Performance66 / 85 → 78%
AI Performance14%
Temperature80%
Noise100%
Audio77 / 90 → 86%
Camera80%
Average61%
85%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials0%Packaging50%Power Use92.2%Repairability40%Software Updates33.3% Total Sustainability Score: 35.9%
More articles related to this deviceNubia Z60S Pro (Z60 Series)Review•努比亚 Z60 超极版领先版评测--超越价格的热门交易 |News•649 美元的超高配置：努比亚 Z60 超前版发布，配备 3... |Review•努比亚 Z60 Ultra 评测--价格小巧、摄像头独特的高...
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Price comparison
Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 657702 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!